Meghan Markle Ditched Royal Duties to Work Unpaid Guest Editor Role at Controversial Vogue Issue, Royal Expert Claims
Meghan Markle’s choice to serve as the guest editor for the September 2019 edition of British Vogue, subtitled “Forces for Change,” has ignited extensive debates among royal watchers and commentators. This issue spotlighted fifteen trailblazing women, including notable figures such as Greta Thunberg and Jacinda Ardern, and aimed to bring attention to various social causes. While the magazine quickly became a bestseller, selling out within just ten days, it also raised eyebrows regarding Meghan’s commitments to her royal responsibilities.
Decline in Royal Engagements
During the period leading up to the release of the Vogue issue, Meghan reportedly engaged in only 22 royal events over the span of seven months, a stark reduction compared to her counterparts, particularly her sister-in-law, Kate Middleton. Critics were quick to point out that the decision to focus on her editorial role may have detracted from her public engagements. This situation was further amplified by the fact that Queen Elizabeth II was notably absent from the magazine, varying sharply from the editorial choices traditionally made by other royals.
Ingrid Seward, editor of Majesty magazine, expressed concerns that Meghan’s focus on the Vogue project appeared more beneficial to the magazine itself rather than the royal family. This contrast in approach raised questions about how Meghan and Harry’s decisions would reshape the perception and role of the monarchy moving forward.
Comparisons to Kate Middleton
Royal biographer Robert Lacey highlighted that Meghan’s editorial commitment coincided with a decrease in royal duties, particularly during her maternity leave. In comparison, Kate Middleton maintained a busy schedule with numerous public engagements, showcasing a different approach to balancing family life and royal responsibilities. This disparity has led many to draw conflicting narratives about their approaches to modern royalty.
Meghan’s choice to refrain from appearing on the cover herself also generated speculation. This decision was rooted in her desire to shift the focus to other women’s achievements rather than her own, aiming to present a more authentic and inclusive message. Critics, however, interpreted this choice as a subtle jab at Kate, who had previously graced the cover of Vogue.
Strained Relationships and Creative Differences
Despite the initial success of the Vogue issue, reports indicated that Meghan’s relationship with Edward Enninful, then-editor of British Vogue, became strained following disagreements over subsequent projects. The tensions reportedly escalated in the wake of discussions surrounding the lack of a cover for her charitable initiatives connected to the One Young World Summit. This lack of cover became a point of contention, raising questions about the impact of royal duties on personal aspirations and collaborations.
As the dynamics within the royal family evolve, the implications of Meghan’s decision to prioritize a high-profile editorial role over traditional royal engagements continue to spark discussion. Royal experts have noted the influence this period may have on how royal functions and public engagement are approached in the future.
Conclusion
In summary, Meghan Markle’s guest editorship of Vogue brought substantial attention and critical acclaim to the magazine, yet it also prompted significant scrutiny regarding her dedication to royal duties and the intricate dynamics within the royal family. As royal responsibilities become increasingly intertwined with personal projects, the question remains: how will this shape the evolution of modern royalty? To stay updated on royal news and analysis, be sure to check back for more insights!
