Blake Lively’s Legal Team Slams Justin Baldoni’s Attorneys Over ‘Disruptive’ Deposition Behavior
Blake Lively’s Legal Team Condemns Justin Baldoni’s Attorneys for Disruptive Conduct During Depositions
Blake Lively’s legal team has recently taken a strong stance against Justin Baldoni’s attorneys, accusing them of engaging in “disruptive” and unprofessional conduct during depositions related to the ongoing harassment and retaliation lawsuit. According to court documents obtained by RadarOnline.com, Lively’s lawyers have filed a motion for sanctions, citing multiple instances of inappropriate behavior, including invasive questioning and delaying tactics that have hindered the discovery process.
The motion, filed on December 19, highlights several key issues that have caused friction between the two legal teams. Among the most serious allegations are claims that Baldoni’s counsel asked Lively invasive questions about her sexual history—questions that Lively’s team argues are irrelevant to the case and violate the protections afforded by the rape shield law. This law is designed to protect victims of sexual assault and abuse from being subjected to such intrusive inquiries during legal proceedings.
Details of the Alleged Deposition Misconduct
Michael J. Gottlieb, representing Blake Lively, detailed the problematic behavior in a letter to Judge Lewis J. Liman. He accused Baldoni’s attorneys of repeatedly making speaking objections during depositions, even in cases where they were not the defending counsel. This conduct, according to Gottlieb, wasted valuable time and disrupted the flow of testimony. The letter described these interruptions as a “basic lack of decorum,” with some attorneys reportedly laughing and engaging in what was described as “speechifying.”
Lively’s legal team also noted that they had previously raised concerns about the inappropriate questioning in September, emphasizing that Lively’s sexual and romantic history was irrelevant to the claims of harassment and retaliation. Despite these warnings, the behavior allegedly continued, prompting the motion for sanctions.
The tensions escalated further during a deposition on December 15, when Lively’s lawyers accused Baldoni’s attorneys, Bryan Freedman and Kevin Fritz, of impeding the fair examination of a defense expert witness, Nicole Alexander. The motion claims that Freedman and Fritz engaged in lengthy, rambling objections that frustrated the deposition process. As a result, Lively’s team has requested that the court compel the expert to undergo a second deposition and cover the costs associated with the additional session.
Previous Legal Battles and Ongoing Court Proceedings
This is not the first time Blake Lively’s legal team has sought sanctions against Justin Baldoni’s attorneys. Earlier motions accused Freedman of attempting to try the case in the media and withholding evidence during discovery. Freedman’s controversial comment about taking Lively’s deposition at Madison Square Garden, charging admission, and livestreaming the testimony was labeled a “ghoulish taunt” by Lively’s counsel, who stressed that federal courts are meant for justice, not public spectacle.
The latest motion for sanctions comes as both parties prepare for a court-mandated settlement conference scheduled for February. Originally, the trial was set to begin in March but has since been postponed to May 18. Meanwhile, Baldoni’s legal team has filed a motion for summary judgment, dismissing Lively’s allegations as a “litany of minor grievances.” Lively’s attorneys have pushed back against this characterization, accusing Baldoni of trying to evade accountability.
Judge Liman is expected to hear arguments on both the summary judgment request and the sanctions motions on January 22, marking a critical moment in this high-profile legal dispute.
Conclusion
The ongoing legal battle between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni continues to intensify as Lively’s legal team calls out Baldoni’s attorneys for disruptive deposition behavior and inappropriate questioning. These developments underscore the complexities and tensions inherent in high-stakes harassment and retaliation lawsuits. As the case moves closer to trial, all eyes will be on the upcoming court hearings and settlement discussions.
If you want to stay updated on this evolving story and other celebrity legal battles, be sure to subscribe to our newsletter and follow our latest coverage.
